For 30 years, insurance carriers have used scoring software to profile plaintiff firms — who lowballs settle, who litigates, who folds before trial. EzCase ends the asymmetry. Plug into your case management system, let our AI extract every settlement in your history, and walk into every negotiation with the same kind of intelligence the other side has had all along.
AI extraction with a full audit trail. Confidence ratings on every field. Source documents on every value. Missing fields surfaced, never hidden.
Connect your case management system. EzCase reads every document on every case — disbursement sheets, releases, demand letters, medical records, settlement statements. Returns structured data with confidence ratings, document citations, and explicitly flagged missing fields.
No black box. No hallucinations. Audit every extraction.
Pick a case. EzCase auto-fills filters for everything comparable — case type, state, severity, injuries, treatment, carrier, venue. Pull up the comp set in seconds.
The senior partner's gut just got a paper trail.
The number every demand letter should anchor to. EzCase calculates the floor below which your firm has not historically accepted comparable cases.
This is the line you don't cross. Your case managers and associates need to see it before every negotiation.
Generate a full settlement analysis report in seconds — distribution analysis, recovery bands, notable cases, injury themes, outliers, trend observations. The kind of report that takes a PI analyst a day.
Now it takes thirty seconds. Hand it to a partner before the mediation prep call.
Set the negotiation range your case managers and associates can settle within autonomously. Within the range, they have authority to close — no escalation, no slowdown. Outside the range, the offer flags for partner review.
Stop being the bottleneck on every in-range settlement. Scale negotiation work without losing control.
Pull a case number, get a complete carrier demand letter — liability summary, injury narrative, economic and non-economic damages, settlement demand, policy disclosure request. Ready for letterhead.
Anonymized cross-firm settlement intelligence. See how the rest of the plaintiff bar is settling against the same carriers.
You wouldn't trust an analyst who couldn't show their work. Why would you trust AI that can't?
Every case extraction returns a confidence rating — HIGH, MEDIUM, or LOW. Every value is traceable to the source document ("Docs 9–11, Updated Disbursement Sheets, signed 2024-09-11"). Every missing field is explicitly named, not silently dropped ("Missing fields: totalPolicyLimits, propertyDamageValue").
When your firm's data ends up in a demand letter or mediation deck, you'll know exactly where it came from — and where it didn't. No black boxes. No guessing what the AI made up.
The workflow starts when a plaintiff case comes in. From there, EzCase helps your team structure the case, surface comparable outcomes, organize AI-assisted analysis, and leave with clearer ranges, charts, and next-step strategy.
The firm receives a new case and captures the facts that will shape value: injury, venue, liability posture, treatment, and damages signals.
The live case is anchored to the firm workflow so the search begins from the real record, not from rough memory or disconnected notes.
EzCase searches the repository for similar outcomes by fact pattern, injury profile, jurisdiction, and other decision-shaping details.
The platform organizes highs, lows, outliers, and supporting case signals into a clearer analysis layer your team can actually review.
Settlement low, high, average, and a working target become easier to define with more structure and less subjective drift.
Charts, comparison views, and a sharper next-step posture support demand drafting, mediation prep, case review, and negotiation.
This quick product view shows how legal teams can move through dashboard data, compare outcomes, review charts, and get to a sharper case-value conversation without digging through scattered history.
EzCase integrates directly with the case management systems plaintiff firms already use — Filevine, Litify, MyCase, SmartAdvocate, Clio, Neos, CloudLex, Lawmatics, PracticePanther — and automatically extracts every case in your history. Then structures the data for the comparisons that actually drive negotiation.
Carrier scoring software has profiled plaintiff firms since the 1990s. Which firms settle for less. Which firms accept first offers. Which firms walk away from trial. The data has flowed one direction — into the hands of the people writing the checks.
EzCase ends the asymmetry.
Same injury severity, same policy limits, same venue. EzCase shows where each carrier lands across your firm's history — and which carriers consistently pay below the median.
Medical specials, treatment duration, surgical intervention, pre-existing conditions, venue. See which signals correlate with higher settlements at your firm — and what your real medical-specials-to-settlement multiplier looks like by carrier.
Comparable cases that settled below your firm's median. The pattern is there — buried in your case management system. EzCase makes it visible.
Bring settlements, verdicts, and case details into one structured repository your team can actually use.
Narrow by injury profile, venue, case type, and other relevant factors to surface useful internal comparisons faster.
Use prior outcomes and firm benchmarks to support valuation conversations, negotiation planning, and staff alignment.
Full visibility across every case, every attorney, every range. Compare attorney and case manager performance — by carrier, by case type, by venue, by injury severity — and tie compensation directly to the data. Bonus structures backed by performance metrics, not memory. Set the negotiation authority ranges that let your team move fast without you in the loop. Identify which carriers your firm has settled lowest with — and where you're leaving money on the table.
Faster prep, with the right boundaries. Case managers see comparable cases and the Minimum Settlement Target — but not the firm's lowest historical settlements. No anchoring to the worst outcomes the firm has ever taken. No access to other attorneys' or case managers' caseloads. And when an offer falls within the firm's pre-set negotiation range, case managers have authority to close — no waiting on partner approval, no bottleneck, no slowdown. Out-of-range offers escalate automatically.
Generate a full settlement analysis report — distribution, recovery bands, notable cases, trend observations, outliers, limitations — in seconds. The kind of report that takes a PI analyst half a day. Hand it to a partner before the mediation prep call.
Opt in, and EzCase anonymizes your settlements into the network. In return, you see how every other participating firm is settling against the same carriers. The first cross-firm settlement intelligence layer for the plaintiff bar.
Pick a case, auto-fill filters for everything comparable — case type, state, severity, injuries.
The floor your firm has not historically accepted below. Anchor every demand to it.
See how each carrier settles across your firm's history. The signal carriers have had on you for years — now visible to you.
Pre-set the range your case managers can settle within autonomously. In-range offers close fast. Out-of-range offers escalate.
Distribution analysis, recovery bands, notable cases, trend observations. Half a day of analyst work. Thirty seconds of AI.
Compare every attorney and case manager — by carrier, case type, venue, injury severity. Tie compensation to the data.
Case number in. Carrier demand letter out. Liability, damages, settlement demand, policy disclosure — all populated.
Anonymized cross-firm settlement intelligence. See how the rest of the bar is settling against the same carriers.
Where your team feels the difference once EzCase is connected to your case history.
AI Analyzer reports replace hours of manual settlement analysis.
Anchor every demand and counteroffer in organized history.
Settlement patterns by carrier, by venue, by injury type — pulled from your own case history.
Settlement Authority ranges let your team close in-range offers without bottlenecking partners.
Plaintiff personal injury firms that want a cleaner way to value cases, draft demand letters, and prepare for negotiation. Used by firm owners, managing attorneys, case managers, and analysts.
No. EzCase sits on top of your case management system. Your CRM tracks the case. EzCase tells you what it's worth — and drafts the demand letter.
Every extraction returns a confidence rating, document-level citations, and an explicit list of missing fields. You can audit every value back to the source document. No black boxes.
No. EzCase pulls your case history automatically from your case management system — and works around missing fields, dates, and policy limits. Most firms see their first carrier-by-carrier patterns within days of connecting.
A coming-soon feature that anonymizes your firm's settlements into a cross-firm dataset. Participating firms get visibility into how the rest of the plaintiff bar is settling against the same carriers — the first cross-firm settlement intelligence layer for personal injury law. Opt-in, anonymized, aggregate-only.
Yes. The Case Manager View was specifically built so newer staff can see comparable cases and the Minimum Settlement Target — but not the firm's lowest historical settlements. No anchoring to worst outcomes. No accidental undervaluation in the demand letter.
Principals set the negotiation range their case managers and associates can settle within autonomously. When an offer falls inside the range, the team has authority to close — no escalation, no waiting. When an offer falls outside the range, it flags for partner review automatically. Firms scale negotiation work without losing oversight on the cases that need it.
Both are in active development. Request a demo and we'll add you to the early-access list — participating firms get first access and shape the feature roadmap.
A live walkthrough of the full platform — AI extraction, find similar cases, Minimum Settlement Target, carrier-by-carrier patterns, settlement authority ranges, the AI Analyzer report. After the demo, we'll outline what connecting your case management system looks like — and you'll see your own firm's data the moment you're up and running.